Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The risk of allergic reaction to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and recommended evaluation and management : a systematic review, meta-analysis, GRADE assessment, and international consensus approach

  • Matthew Greenhawt
  • , Elissa M. Abrams
  • , Marcus Shaker
  • , Derek K. Chu
  • , David Khan
  • , Cem Akin
  • , Waleed Alqurashi
  • , Peter Arkwright
  • , James L. Baldwin
  • , Moshe Ben-Shoshan
  • , Jonathan Bernstein
  • , Theresa Bingemann
  • , Katharina Blumchen
  • , Aideen Byrne
  • , Antonio Bognanni
  • , Dianne Campbell
  • , Ronna Campbell
  • , Zain Chagla
  • , Edmond S. Chan
  • , Jeffrey Chan
  • Pasquale Comberiati, Timothy E. Dribin, Anne K. Ellis, David M. Fleischer, Adam Fox, Pamela A. Frischmeyer-Guerrerio, Remi Gagnon, Mitchell H. Grayson, Caroline C. Horner, Jonathan Hourihane, Constance H. Katelaris, Harold Kim, John M. Kelso, David Lang, Dennis Ledford, Michael Levin, Jay Lieberman, Richard Loh, Doug Mack, Bruce Mazer, Giselle Mosnaim, Daniel Munblit, S. Shahzad Mustafa, Anil Nanda, John Oppenheimer, Kirsten P. Perrett, Allison Ramsey, Matthew Rank, Kara Robertson, Javed Sheikh, Jonathan M. Spergel, David Stukus, Mimi L. K. Tang, James M. Tracy, Paul J. Turner, Anna Whalen-Browne, Dana Wallace, Julie Wang, Susan Waserman, John K. Witry, Margitta Worm, Timothy K. Vander Leek, David B. K. Golden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

198 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Concerns for anaphylaxis may hamper severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) immunization efforts. We convened a multidisciplinary group of international experts in anaphylaxis composed of allergy, infectious disease, emergency medicine, and front-line clinicians to systematically develop recommendations regarding SARS-CoV-2 vaccine immediate allergic reactions. Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, the World Health Organizstion (WHO) global coronavirus database, and the gray literature (inception, March 19, 2021) were systematically searched. Paired reviewers independently selected studies addressing anaphylaxis after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, polyethylene glycol (PEG) and polysorbate allergy, and accuracy of allergy testing for SARS-CoV-2 vaccine allergy. Random effects models synthesized the data to inform recommendations based on the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, agreed upon using a modified Delphi panel. The incidence of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine anaphylaxis is 7.91 cases per million (n = 41,000,000 vaccinations; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 4.02-15.59; 26 studies, moderate certainty), the incidence of 0.15 cases per million patient-years (95% CI 0.11-0.2), and the sensitivity for PEG skin testing is poor, although specificity is high (15 studies, very low certainty). We recommend vaccination over either no vaccination or performing SARS-CoV-2 vaccine/excipient screening allergy testing for individuals without history of a severe allergic reaction to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine/excipient, and a shared decision-making paradigm in consultation with an allergy specialist for individuals with a history of a severe allergic reaction to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine/excipient. We recommend further research to clarify SARS-CoV-2 vaccine/vaccine excipient testing utility in individuals potentially allergic to SARS-CoV2 vaccines or their excipients.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3546-3567
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
Volume9
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The risk of allergic reaction to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and recommended evaluation and management : a systematic review, meta-analysis, GRADE assessment, and international consensus approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this