Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The South China Sea Arbitral Award: Evolving Post-Arbitration Strategies, Implications and Challenges

  • Australian National Centre for Ocean Resources and Security
  • University of Wollongong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

On 12 July 2016, the Arbitral Tribunal formed under Annex VII of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) issued its award on the case brought by the Philippines against China over maritime claims in the South China Sea. The landmark victory categorically declared that China's nine-dash line claim is incompatible with the UNCLOS. The award was also an authoritative interpretation of various important issues relating to UNCLOS including the legal status of maritime features, historic rights, and the duty to preserve the marine environment. However, despite the final and binding nature of the arbitral ruling, China continues to reject the ruling. The shift in Philippine foreign policy under the Duterte administration has led to setting aside the ruling in order to restore amicable diplomatic and economic relations with China. This Special Issue of Asian Politics & Policy explores and revisits the South China Sea arbitral award from a multi-faceted perspective, focusing on challenges, implications, and post-arbitration strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)178-189
Number of pages12
JournalAsian Politics and Policy
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2018
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Policy Studies Organization

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 14 - Life Below Water
    SDG 14 Life Below Water

Keywords

  • arbitral award
  • foreign policy
  • law of the sea
  • South China Sea
  • West Philippine Sea

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The South China Sea Arbitral Award: Evolving Post-Arbitration Strategies, Implications and Challenges'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this