The WPA-Lancet Psychiatry Commission on the future of psychiatry

Dinesh Bhugra, Allan Tasman, Soumitra Pathare, Stefan Priebe, Shubulade Smith, John Torous, Melissa R. Arbuckle, Alex Langford, Renato D. Alarcon, Helen Fung Kum Chiu, Michael B. First, Jerald Kay, Charlene Sunkel, Anita Thapar, Pichet Udomratn, Florence K. Baingana, Devora Kestel, Roger Man Kin Ng, Anita Patel, Livia De PickerKwame Julius McKenzie, Driss Moussaoui, Matt Muijen, Peter Bartlett, Sophie Davison, Tim Exworthy, Nasser Loza, Diana Rose, Julio Torales, Mark Brown, Helen Christensen, Joseph Firth, Matcheri Keshavan, Ang Li, Jukka-Pekka Onnela, Til Wykes, Hussein Elkholy, Gurvinder Kalra, Kate F. Lovett, Michael J. Travis, Antonio Ventriglio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

274 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Psychiatry has always been a medical discipline, but was this development inevitable, and will it always be this way? The profession has changed so much since so-called alienists treated their alienated patients up to the 19th century, when psychiatry as a term emerged. Changes in diagnostic practices, investigations, and therapeutic interventions"”pharmacological, psychological, and social"”have brought psychiatric practice out of asylums and into the community in many countries, but not universally. Early intervention has gone from being an intriguing innovation to standard practice in many countries. However, delivery of these services depends upon resources available, and in many countries around the world such services remain aspirations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)775-818
Number of pages44
JournalThe Lancet Psychiatry
Volume4
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • mental health laws
  • mental health services
  • mental illness
  • psychiatry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The WPA-Lancet Psychiatry Commission on the future of psychiatry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this