Thinking-feeling-imagining futures through creative arts-based participatory research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Aspiration for higher education has been a focus of significant policy intervention in Australia for some time, with numerous large-scale research studies investigating the formation of aspiration amongst high school students. However, case studies in particular schools which might provide insights into the complexities and contradictions of aspirations for individual young people are scarce. This paper explores aspirations for particular futures from the perspectives of young women in a single-sex NSW government school in an area of historically lower HE participation. Rather than conventional interview-based methods where researchers ask young people to articulate their plans for the future, the study adopted creative arts-based methods which enabled students to engage with each other and a range of materials to produce multimodal ‘aspiration artefacts’ of their imagined futures. The method assemblage privileged imagination and embodied feelings, beyond the rational information-driven pedagogies that are promoted in widening participation policies. Our close readings of artefacts created by three Year 9 girls demonstrate that aspiration is a process that is relational, embodied, affectively and discursively constituted; and further, that this is inflected by gender, class and other positionalities in elusive and unanticipated ways. Arts-based methods allow us to tentatively trace the work of thinking–feeling–imagining that is entailed in developing and articulating aspirations for particular futures.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-128
Number of pages16
JournalThe Australian Educational Researcher
Volume47
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • ambition
  • arts
  • methodology
  • research
  • schoolgirls

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Thinking-feeling-imagining futures through creative arts-based participatory research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this