Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Thinking religion and religious studies: a methodological challenge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article argues religious studies is a discipline specifically designed for answering the big questions about religion. The comparative and general study of religion is what emerges when scholarship abandons the big questions about religion. This occurs first by the field’s distancing from theology and later philosophy. Historical and phenomenological approaches present religious studies as a pluralistic and multidisciplinary research field, whilst arguably it is originally polymethodic. The difference, I argue, is that the religious studies discipline is better defined by a multiple methods approach rather than a disciplinary hybridity. I make my argument by discussing the philosophical method of “thinking” as necessary to reclaim for religious studies and specifically making the case for thinking as a key method for religious studies research.
Original languageEnglish
Article number2
Number of pages19
JournalMarburg Journal of Religion
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 May 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 4 - Quality Education
    SDG 4 Quality Education

Keywords

  • Religious studies
  • history of religions
  • philosophy of religion
  • religious thought
  • phenomenology of religion
  • comparative religion
  • multi-disciplinarity
  • Martin Heidegger
  • Friedrich Max Müller
  • methodology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Thinking religion and religious studies: a methodological challenge'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this