Time to re-think the terminology of heart failure?

Serra E. Ivynian, Caleb Ferguson, Patricia M. Davidson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Information should be clear, without being over-simplified and, above all, consistent. While the term 'heart failure' may not adequately reflect the complexity of this condition, changing the terminology may lead to further confusion. Consistency is key. Clearer communication with patients in health literate easy to understand terminology promoting shared decision-making is needed. Patients need to hear the term 'heart failure', understand what it doesn't mean, how it is different to the other heart conditions, recognise their role in managing it, and understand that they can live with it for many years.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)648-650
Number of pages3
JournalEuropean Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
Volume18
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • communication in medicine
  • health literacy
  • heart failure
  • terminology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Time to re-think the terminology of heart failure?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this