Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Towards an integrative mechanistic framework for biodiversity–consumer relationships

  • Fletcher W. Halliday
  • , Susan E. Everingham
  • , Maximilian Bröcher
  • , Anne Ebeling
  • , Anne Kempel
  • , Fabiane M. Mundim
  • , Alexander T. Strauss
  • , Zoe A. Xirocostas
  • , Mayank Kohli
  • Oregon State University
  • University of Bern
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena
  • Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
  • Extremes and Natural Hazards in Alpine Regions Research Centre Cerc
  • Utah State University
  • University of Georgia
  • University of Technology Sydney
  • National Center for Biological Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Terrestrial plant diversity plays a pivotal role in influencing the abundance, diversity, and impacts of herbivores and pathogens (collectively, plant consumers). However, it is unclear whether the relationships between biodiversity and herbivory reflect the same underlying ecological mechanisms as the relationships between biodiversity and disease. This uncertainty results in part from decades of independent, siloed research on each consumer group. We propose that, across herbivores and pathogens, plant diversity–consumer relationships arise from five fundamental factors: (1) density of a focal plant, (2) total plant biomass, (3) plant neighborhood quality, (4) resource diversity, and (5) structural complexity. By matching established hypotheses to these five fundamental factors, we highlight opportunities for growth in the rapidly developing field of plant–consumer interactions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)539-553
Number of pages15
JournalTrends in Ecology and Evolution
Volume40
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2025

Keywords

  • associational resistance
  • biodiversity
  • dilution effect
  • disease
  • herbivory
  • plant–consumer interactions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Towards an integrative mechanistic framework for biodiversity–consumer relationships'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this