Tracking, grading, and student motivation : using group composition and status to predict self-concept and interest in ninth-grade mathematics

Ulrich Trautwein, Oliver Lüdtke, Herbert W. Marsh, Olaf Köller, Jürgen Baumert

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    269 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Assigning students to different classes on the basis of their achievement levels (tracking, streaming, or ability grouping) is an extensively used strategy with widely debated consequences. The authors developed a model of the effects of tracking on self-concept and interest that integrates the opposing predictions of "assimilation" and "contrast" effects, which specifies teacher-assigned grades as a major mediating variable, and tested it in 2 settings in which track level is clearly associated with different status-systematic tracking as a function of school type (Study 1, N = 14,341 German 9th-grade students) and separate streams within a comprehensive school system (Study 2, N = 3,243 German 9th-grade students). The results support predictions that students' math self-concept and math interest differ as a function of the achievement of their reference group, their own achievement, and their teacher-assigned grades. No systematic association between track level and math self-concept was found once individual student achievement, school-/stream-average achievement, and teacher-assigned grades were controlled.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of Educational Psychology
    Publication statusPublished - 2006

    Keywords

    • assimilation
    • contrast
    • interest
    • self-concept
    • student motivation
    • tracking

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Tracking, grading, and student motivation : using group composition and status to predict self-concept and interest in ninth-grade mathematics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this