TY - JOUR
T1 - Tracking, targeting, and conserving soil biodiversity : a monitoring and indicator system can inform policy
AU - Guerra, Carlos A.
AU - Bardgett, Richard D.
AU - Caon, Lucrezia
AU - Crowther, Thomas W.
AU - Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel
AU - Montanarella, Luca
AU - Navarro, Laetitia M.
AU - Orgiazzi, Alberto
AU - Singh, Brajesh K.
AU - Tedersoo, Leho
AU - Vargas-Rojas, Ronald
AU - Briones, Maria J. I.
AU - Buscot, François
AU - Cameron, Erin K.
AU - Cesarz, Simone
AU - Chatzinotas, Antonis
AU - Cowan, Don A.
AU - Djukic, Ika
AU - Hoogen, Johan van den
AU - Lehmann, Anika
AU - Maestre, Fernando T.
AU - Marín, César
AU - Reitz, Thomas
AU - Rillig, Matthias C.
AU - Smith, Linnea C.
AU - Vries, Franciska T. de
AU - Weigelt, Alexandra
AU - Wall, Diana H.
AU - Eisenhauer, Nico
PY - 2021/1/15
Y1 - 2021/1/15
N2 - Nature conservation literature and policy instruments mainly focus on the impacts of human development and the benefits of nature conservation for oceans and aboveground terrestrial organisms (e.g., birds and plants) and processes (e.g., food production), but these efforts almost completely ignore the majority of terrestrial biodiversity that is unseen and living in the soil (1). Little is known about the conservation status of most soil organisms and the effects of nature conservation policies on soil systems. Yet like "canaries in the coal mine," when soil organisms begin to disappear, ecosystems will soon start to underperform, potentially hindering their vital functions for humankind. Soil biodiversity and its ecosystem functions thus require explicit consideration when establishing nature protection priorities and policies and when designing new conservation areas. To inform such efforts, we lay out a global soil biodiversity and ecosystem function monitoring framework to be considered in the context of the post-2020 discussions of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). To support this framework, we suggest a suite of soil ecological indicators based on essential biodiversity variables (EBVs) (2) (see the figure and table S3) that directly link to current global targets such as the ones established under the CBD, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and the Paris Agreement (table S1).
AB - Nature conservation literature and policy instruments mainly focus on the impacts of human development and the benefits of nature conservation for oceans and aboveground terrestrial organisms (e.g., birds and plants) and processes (e.g., food production), but these efforts almost completely ignore the majority of terrestrial biodiversity that is unseen and living in the soil (1). Little is known about the conservation status of most soil organisms and the effects of nature conservation policies on soil systems. Yet like "canaries in the coal mine," when soil organisms begin to disappear, ecosystems will soon start to underperform, potentially hindering their vital functions for humankind. Soil biodiversity and its ecosystem functions thus require explicit consideration when establishing nature protection priorities and policies and when designing new conservation areas. To inform such efforts, we lay out a global soil biodiversity and ecosystem function monitoring framework to be considered in the context of the post-2020 discussions of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). To support this framework, we suggest a suite of soil ecological indicators based on essential biodiversity variables (EBVs) (2) (see the figure and table S3) that directly link to current global targets such as the ones established under the CBD, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and the Paris Agreement (table S1).
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:62006
U2 - 10.1126/science.abd7926
DO - 10.1126/science.abd7926
M3 - Article
C2 - 33446546
SN - 0036-8075
VL - 371
SP - 239
EP - 241
JO - Science
JF - Science
IS - 6526
ER -