TY - JOUR
T1 - Traditional health practitioners and sustainable development : a case study in South Africa
AU - Street, R. A.
AU - Smith, M.
AU - Moshabela, M.
AU - Shezi, B.
AU - Webster, C.
AU - Falkenberg, T.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Objectives: To highlight legal and regulatory advances relating to South African traditional health practitioners (THPs) over the past 10 years and discuss the implications for the translation of health policies into guidelines for sustainable practice supporting public health. Study design: This is a rapid, structured literature review. Methods: A rapid, structured literature review was undertaken to identify relevant studies related to South African THPs involving a search of peer-reviewed literature from three databases and a grey literature internet search. The identified citations were screened, critically appraised, and narratively synthesized. Results: Efforts to regulate THPs in South Africa are underway; however, the lack of a regulatory framework for traditional practices is hampering progress. Several efforts to collaborate with THPs have been made over the years, many of which were not systematically evaluated and not based on principles of mutual respect. Existing collaborative examples need to be further supported by cost-effective evidence to suit the South African public health budget. Furthermore, small collaborative research efforts do not take into consideration the scale up of interventions. Conclusions: THPs in South Africa represent an important healthcare resource. However, the current policy environment does not support indicators to describe, monitor, and/or evaluate the role of THPs in the healthcare system.
AB - Objectives: To highlight legal and regulatory advances relating to South African traditional health practitioners (THPs) over the past 10 years and discuss the implications for the translation of health policies into guidelines for sustainable practice supporting public health. Study design: This is a rapid, structured literature review. Methods: A rapid, structured literature review was undertaken to identify relevant studies related to South African THPs involving a search of peer-reviewed literature from three databases and a grey literature internet search. The identified citations were screened, critically appraised, and narratively synthesized. Results: Efforts to regulate THPs in South Africa are underway; however, the lack of a regulatory framework for traditional practices is hampering progress. Several efforts to collaborate with THPs have been made over the years, many of which were not systematically evaluated and not based on principles of mutual respect. Existing collaborative examples need to be further supported by cost-effective evidence to suit the South African public health budget. Furthermore, small collaborative research efforts do not take into consideration the scale up of interventions. Conclusions: THPs in South Africa represent an important healthcare resource. However, the current policy environment does not support indicators to describe, monitor, and/or evaluate the role of THPs in the healthcare system.
KW - South Africa
KW - health policy
KW - medical care
KW - traditional medicine
UR - http://handle.westernsydney.edu.au:8081/1959.7/uws:50487
U2 - 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.07.021
DO - 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.07.021
M3 - Article
SN - 0033-3506
VL - 165
SP - 1
EP - 5
JO - Public Health
JF - Public Health
ER -