Trimming the fat reveals a one-factor construct of Hong's Psychological Reactance Scale

Peter K. Jonason, Angela Bryan, Jacob Herrera

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    11 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    It is unclear whether one should measure psychological reactance as a global one-factor trait or a multidimensional complex of traits. There is evidence on both sides of this debate, and we sought to add to that conversation. In two studies, we attempted to determine the best factor structure of Hong's Psychological Reactance Scale. First (N = 240), we conducted Principal Components Analyses, demonstrating that a one factor solution with eight items removed was the best fit. Second (N = 266), a confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated this 10-item scale had reasonable psychometric properties and assessments of the nomological network suggested this scale was negatively correlated with tendencies to abdicate to authority and positively with tendencies to aggress. Our results suggest that a one-factor structure is reasonable for assessing psychological reactance.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)220-228
    Number of pages9
    JournalIndividual Differences Research
    Volume8
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Trimming the fat reveals a one-factor construct of Hong's Psychological Reactance Scale'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this