Typologies of sprawl : investigating United States metropolitan land use patterns

Andrea Sarzynski, George Galster, Lisa Stack

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    35 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    We investigate patterns of residential and nonresidential land use in 311 United States metropolitan (Extended Urban) areas in 2000 using four measures: intensity, compactness, mixing, and core-dominance. A cluster analysis revealed four distinctive groups of land use patterns: (1) Most-Intense, Least-Compact, Least-Mixed, More-Monocentric Development, (2) Less-Intense, Most-Compact, Less-Mixed, Less-Monocentric Development, (3) Least-Intense, Less-Compact, Most-Mixed, Most-Monocentric Development, (4) More-Intense, More-Compact, More-Mixed, Polycentric Development. Bivariate statistics demonstrated that geographic, historic, economic, demographic, and transport variables differentiate land use pattern types. Based on their multidimensional distinctions, we label the four types of metropolitan areas: Ascendants, Insulars, Redevelopers, and Cosmopolitans.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)48-70
    Number of pages23
    JournalUrban Geography
    Volume35
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Keywords

    • cities and towns
    • growth
    • land use
    • metropolitan areas

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Typologies of sprawl : investigating United States metropolitan land use patterns'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this