UNCLOS/maritime boundary delimitation : a normative standard? Part II, Is it still insufficiently addressed?

Emdadul Haque, Daud Hassan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Maritime delimitation is a complex, long-lasting and sensitive political and diplomatic process. A State cannot determine its maritime boundary unilaterally, and where the delimitation claims of different States overlap, it becomes an “international facet”. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) aims to handle that international aspect, but how effective is it? The evolution of the contemporary international law of the sea, although started with the intention of formulating general principles for maritime boundary delimitation, finally lacks the normativity of delimitation where it was most needed. This is probably why Brown described the delimitation provisions of the UNCLOS as “abominably bad”. However, while examining the effectiveness of the delimitation provisions of UNCLOS, an analysis of its wording is inextricably linked to the process.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)517-530
    Number of pages14
    JournalEnvironmental Policy and Law
    Volume44
    Issue number6
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Keywords

    • law of the sea
    • maritime boundaries

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'UNCLOS/maritime boundary delimitation : a normative standard? Part II, Is it still insufficiently addressed?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this