Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Unpacking weight management interventions measuring eating disorder risk in adults: coding of components of interventions in a systematic review

  • Natalie B. Lister
  • , Rabia Khalid
  • , Isabelle R. Jardine
  • , Samantha Pryde
  • , Hannah Melville
  • , Anna Lene Seidler
  • , Kylie E. Hunter
  • , Amy L. Ahern
  • , Louise A. Baur
  • , Caroline Braet
  • , Sarah P. Garnett
  • , Andrew J. Hill
  • , Sarah Maguire
  • , Dasha Nicholls
  • , Susan J. Paxton
  • , Milan Piya
  • , Amanda Sainsbury
  • , Katharine Steinbeck
  • , Denise E. Wilfley
  • , Kelly Cooper
  • Genevieve Dammery, Alicia M. Grunseit, Faith Anne N. Heeren, Rebecca A. Jones, Theodore K. Kyle, Fiona Quigley, Molly Robbins, Aviva H. Ariel-Donges, Rachel D. Barnes, Kristine Beaulieu, Kerri N. Boutelle, Simona Calugi, Kelly M. Carpenter, Hoi Lun Cheng, Riccardo Dalle Grave, Marcelo Demarzo, Dawn M. Eichen, Erin L. Glynn, Katrijn Houben, Corby K. Martin, Janell L. Mensinger, Jayanthi Raman, Kristin M. von Ranson, Hollie A. Raynor, Elizabeth Rieger, Eric Robinson, Vera Salvo, Nancy E. Sherwood, Sharon A. Simpson, Evelyn Smith, Rachael W. Taylor, Krista A. Varady, Victoria Whitelock, Brittany J. Johnson, Hiba Jebeile, EDIT Collaboration
  • The University of Sydney
  • Flinders University
  • University of Rostock
  • Greifswald/Rostock
  • University of Cambridge
  • The Children's Hospital at Westmead
  • Ghent University
  • University of Leeds
  • Imperial College London
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • La Trobe University
  • Camden and Campbelltown Hospitals
  • University of Western Australia
  • Washington University St. Louis
  • Weight Issues Network
  • The Obesity Collective
  • Wake Forest University
  • WW International, New York
  • ConscienHealth
  • Ulster University
  • Nova Southeastern University
  • Reciprocity Health
  • University of Minnesota
  • Copenhagen University Hospital
  • University of California San Diego
  • Villa Garda Hospital
  • RVO Health
  • Federal University of Sao Pualo
  • University of California at San Diego
  • Nuchi Health LLC, Salt Lake City
  • Maastricht University
  • Pennington Biomedical Research Center
  • University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW
  • University of Calgary, Canada
  • University of Tennessee, Knoxville
  • Australian National University
  • University of Liverpool
  • Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo
  • University of Glasgow
  • University of Otago
  • University of Illinois at Chicago
  • Evidence and Implementation Department
  • Children’s Hospital Westmead Clinical School

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Adult weight management interventions are complex; better understanding of the intervention components that may impact eating disorder (ED) risk is required. Methods: Weight management randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for adults with overweight/obesity that measured ED risk were systematically searched in four databases and two trial registries. A project-specific codebook was used to code 84 delivery features and 89 intervention strategies of trials. Individual strategies were grouped into 20 clusters which were further grouped into five broad categories. Trial investigators verified coding and narrative synthesis using descriptive statistics of findings was reported. Results: Of 14,880 identified, 58 eligible trials were coded, of which 26 trials with 64 intervention arms were verified and therefore included. Intervention arms included a mean (SD) of 24 (11) intervention strategies. Commonly used intervention strategy clusters were nutrition education (91%), dietary behavior change strategies (84%), physical activity education (81%), and dietary self-monitoring (80%). Few interventions used strategies in the category of psychological components (13–41%). The median (range) intervention duration was 27 (4–104) weeks, and contacts with participants typically included a staged approach of weekly to monthly contact. Conclusion: Adult weight management interventions are multifactorial with varying delivery features and intervention strategies. Despite this, psychological (e.g. weight stigma) and sleep-health related strategies are either rarely used or are underreported. Breaking down intervention components using our framework can help identify which strategies influence outcomes, including eating disorder risk, and inform the design and reporting of future interventions.
Original languageEnglish
Article number202
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Eating Disorders
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Jun 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Unpacking weight management interventions measuring eating disorder risk in adults: coding of components of interventions in a systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this