Abstract
The 1970s witnessed the emergence of a protest-based environmental movement in Australia. We outline here the history of the unstable meeting of environmentalism and Aboriginal interests, before turning to Marcia Langton's recent critique of the progressive 'green left' in Australia. 1 We summarise Langton's argument: environmentalists would deny Aboriginal groups the benefits that flow from native title-related agreements; environmentalists live at luxurious distance from the realities of remote and rural Aboriginal poverty and social problems; environmentalists exalt 'noble savages'. We critique these claims on the basis that they pay inadequate attention to the structural inequities that underpin the market in native title interests and, further, deny the reality that Aboriginal groups often seek to form strategic alliances with green groups, arguing for conservation of their country on their own"”or shared"”terms. We argue that any appraisal of the present status of 'green-black' relations needs to consider these factors seriously.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 301-323 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Australian Journal of Anthropology |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
Keywords
- Aboriginal Australians
- environmentalism
- mineral industries
- mining
- native title (Australia)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Unstable relations : a critical appraisal of indigeneity and environmentalism in contemporary Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver