TY - JOUR
T1 - Validating and developing a shortened version of the detail and flexibility (DFlex) questionnaire for eating disorders, anxiety and depression
AU - Giles, Sarah
AU - Hughes, Elizabeth K.
AU - Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Matthew
AU - Kiropoulos, Litza
AU - Donnelly, Brooke
AU - Russell, Janice
AU - Krug, Isabel
PY - 2024/1
Y1 - 2024/1
N2 - Objective: To validate the original and a shortened version of the Detail and Flexibility (DFlex) Questionnaire. Method: Confirmatory factor analyses, internal consistency, and discriminant validity estimates were conducted within individuals with a diagnosis of an eating disorder (ED) (n = 124), an anxiety disorder and/or depression (n = 219), and a community sample (n = 852) (Part 1). Convergent validity of the DFlex through comparisons with the Autism Spectrum Quotient, Wisconsin Card Sorting Task, and Group Embedded Figures Task was undertaken within a combined ED and community sample (N = 68). Test-retest reliability of the DFlex was also examined across 2 years in a community sample (N = 85) (Part 2). Results: The original factor structure of the DFlex was not supported. Hence, a shortened version, the DFlex-Revised, was developed. Good discriminant validity was obtained for the DFlex and DFlex-Revised, however, support for convergent validity was mixed. Finally, the 2-year test-retest reliability for the two DFlex versions was found to be low, suggesting potential malleability in construct over this timeframe. Conclusions: Further research is needed to validate the DFlex in clinical and non-clinical populations using different neurocognitive tests. Test-retest, using varied time intervals, should also be assessed.
AB - Objective: To validate the original and a shortened version of the Detail and Flexibility (DFlex) Questionnaire. Method: Confirmatory factor analyses, internal consistency, and discriminant validity estimates were conducted within individuals with a diagnosis of an eating disorder (ED) (n = 124), an anxiety disorder and/or depression (n = 219), and a community sample (n = 852) (Part 1). Convergent validity of the DFlex through comparisons with the Autism Spectrum Quotient, Wisconsin Card Sorting Task, and Group Embedded Figures Task was undertaken within a combined ED and community sample (N = 68). Test-retest reliability of the DFlex was also examined across 2 years in a community sample (N = 85) (Part 2). Results: The original factor structure of the DFlex was not supported. Hence, a shortened version, the DFlex-Revised, was developed. Good discriminant validity was obtained for the DFlex and DFlex-Revised, however, support for convergent validity was mixed. Finally, the 2-year test-retest reliability for the two DFlex versions was found to be low, suggesting potential malleability in construct over this timeframe. Conclusions: Further research is needed to validate the DFlex in clinical and non-clinical populations using different neurocognitive tests. Test-retest, using varied time intervals, should also be assessed.
UR - https://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:75139
U2 - 10.1002/erv.3014
DO - 10.1002/erv.3014
M3 - Article
SN - 1072-4133
VL - 32
SP - 32
EP - 45
JO - European Eating Disorders Review
JF - European Eating Disorders Review
IS - 1
ER -