Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Validity of nutrition-related outcome measures in eating disorder treatment: a scoping review

  • Lauren Pearson
  • , Amy Kirkegaard
  • , Jennifer Crowley
  • , Kylie Matthews-Rensch
  • , Lauren Ball
  • University of Queensland
  • The University of Auckland
  • Queensland Health

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This scoping review aimed to identify nutrition-related outcome measures used in experimental eating disorder studies and synthesise evidence on their validity. Five databases were searched for experimental studies reporting nutrition-related outcome measures in eating disorder treatment, published between January 1990 and February 2025. Data on outcome measures, their context and validity were extracted and synthesised according to alignment with the Nutrition Care Process, a framework used by dietitians. A supplementary search identified additional evidence on the validity of each measure. Sixty studies were included. Most were randomised controlled trials (n = 39) focusing on anorexia nervosa (n = 18) or binge eating disorder (n = 18). Fifty outcome measures may indicate nutrition-related change, though used and defined inconsistently. One tool addressed all Nutrition Care Process categories and 52% (n = 26) demonstrated evidence of validity. No validated tools were explicitly designed to assess nutrition-related outcomes. The development and validation of a nutrition-specific outcome tool is a priority.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages31
JournalEating Disorders
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print (In Press) - 2026

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validity of nutrition-related outcome measures in eating disorder treatment: a scoping review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this