Variations of image interpretations of radiologists from different populations in mammography and tomosynthesis with different levels of breast density

P. D. Y. Trieu, Q. Xiao, Y. Gu, Sarah J. Lewis, M. L. Barron, K. Tapia, P. C. Brennan, T. Li

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the diagnostic performances of Australian and Shanghai-based Chinese radiologists in reading full-field digital mammogram (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with different levels of breast density. Approach: Eighty-two Australian radiologists interpreted a 60-case FFDM set, and 29 radiologists also reported a 35-case DBT set. Sixty Shanghai radiologists read the same FFDM set, and 32 radiologists read the DBT set. The diagnostic performances of Australian and Shanghai radiologists were assessed using truth data (cancer cases were biopsy proven) and compared overall in specificity, case sensitivity, lesion sensitivity, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) area under the curve, and jack-knife free-response receiver operating characteristics (JAFROC) figure of merit, and they were stratified by case characteristics using the Mann-Whitney U test. The Spearman rank test was used to explore the association between radiologists' performances and their work experience in mammogram interpretation. Results: There were significantly higher performances of Australian radiologists compared with Shanghai radiologists in low breast density for case sensitivity, lesion sensitivity, ROC, and JAFROC in the FFDM set (P < 0.0001); in high breast density, Shanghai radiologists' performances in lesion sensitivity and JAFROC were also lower than Australian radiologists (P < 0.0001). In the DBT test set, Australian radiologists performed better than Shanghai radiologists in cancer detection in both low and high breast density. The work experience of Australian radiologists was positively linked to their diagnostic performances, whereas this association was not statistically significant in Shanghai radiologists. Conclusion: There were significant variations in reading performances between Australian and Shanghai radiologists in FFDM and DBT across different levels of breast density, lesion types, and lesion sizes. An effective training initiative tailored to suit local readers is essential to enhancing the diagnostic accuracy of Shanghai radiologists.

Original languageEnglish
Article number025502
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Medical Imaging
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Variations of image interpretations of radiologists from different populations in mammography and tomosynthesis with different levels of breast density'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this