Varroa destructor reproduction and cell re-capping in mite-resistant Apis mellifera populations

Stephen J. Martin, George P. Hawkins, Laura E. Brettell, Natasha Reece, Maria E. Correia-Oliveira, Michael H. Allsopp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Globalization has facilitated the spread of emerging pests such as the Varroa destructor mite, resulting in the near global distribution of the pest. In South African and Brazilian honey bees, mite-resistant colonies appeared within a decade; in Europe, mite-resistant colonies are rare, but several of these exhibited high levels of “re-capping” behavior. We studied re-capping in Varroa-naive (UK/Australia) and Varroa-resistant (South Africa and Brazil) populations and found very low and very high levels, respectively, with the resistant populations targeting mite-infested cells. Furthermore, 54% of artificially infested A. m. capensis worker cells were removed after 10 days and 83% of the remaining infested cells were re-capped. Such targeted re-capping of drone cells did not occur. We propose that cell opening is a fundamental trait in mite-resistant populations and that re-capping is an accurate proxy for this behavior.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)369-381
Number of pages13
JournalApidologie
Volume51
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Open Access - Access Right Statement

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Keywords

  • South Africa
  • Varroa destructor
  • globalization
  • honeybee
  • reproduction
  • toleration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Varroa destructor reproduction and cell re-capping in mite-resistant Apis mellifera populations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this