Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

VERMONT non-optimised: feasibility of angiography-derived vFFR using baseline diagnostic catheter images

  • Daniel Akrawi
  • , Krishna Kadappu
  • , James Xu
  • , Tamer Yousef Naguib Badie
  • , Oliver Gibbs
  • , Hashim Kachwalla
  • , Phong TD Nguyen
  • , Rahul Kurup
  • , Upul Premawardhana
  • , Sidney Lo
  • , Justyn Huang
  • , Hao Tran
  • , Kavie Soosapilla
  • , Aiden O'loughlin
  • , Annemarie Hennessy
  • , Giuseppe Femia
  • Liverpool Hospital
  • University of New South Wales
  • Campbelltown Hospital
  • Department Of Cardiology
  • Western Sydney University
  • SWSLHD
  • University of Sydney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Vessel-fractional-flow-reserve (vFFR) estimates coronary physiology from the three-dimensional reconstruction of two angiographic projections using computational fluid dynamics. Although its diagnostic accuracy using optimised angiographic acquisitions is well established, evidence supporting its use with baseline diagnostic catheter images remains limited. Aims: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of real-time vFFR derived from baseline diagnostic catheter images against wire-based FFR, and to compare its performance with vFFR computed from optimised angiographic projections. Methods: VERMONT Non-Optimised was a prospective, single-centre, blinded study in which real-time vFFR derived from both baseline diagnostic and optimised images were measured and compared with simultaneous wire-based FFR. A wire-based FFR of ≤ 0.80 defined a physiologically significant lesion. Results: In 195 patients with 205 intermediate lesions, 56 (27.3%) lesions were excluded from vFFR analysis. vFFR derived from baseline diagnostic images demonstrated an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI,0.87–0.96) for detecting lesions with FFR ≤ 0.80, achieving 94% sensitivity, 75% specificity, a negative predictive value of 96%, and a positive predictive value of 67%. Baseline diagnostic and optimised vFFR were strongly correlated (R = 0.87,p < 0.001), with a mean bias of −0.0075 ± 0.0490 and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.93 (95% CI,0.90–0.95), indicating excellent agreement. Conclusion: Real-time vFFR derived from judiciously selected baseline diagnostic catheter images demonstrated strong overall accuracy and high sensitivity for detecting physiologically significant lesions, with similar diagnostic performance to vFFR derived from optimised images. These findings support the use of vFFR as a reliable screening tool for intermediate lesions in both prospective and retrospective settings.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101905
Number of pages7
JournalIJC Heart and Vasculature
Volume64
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2026

Keywords

  • Angiogram based fractional flow reserve
  • Baseline diagnostic images
  • FFR
  • Fractional flow reserve
  • Vessel fractional flow reserve
  • vFFR

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'VERMONT non-optimised: feasibility of angiography-derived vFFR using baseline diagnostic catheter images'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this