Victimhood, truth and criminal justice failure in relation to anti-homosexual violence and killings in New South Wales

Stephen Tomsen, Tyrone Kirchengast

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper discusses and analyses the consequences of the inadequate criminal justice response regarding victims of fatal anti-homosexual/transgender violence in New South Wales (NSW) in the late twentieth century, and subsequent developments and claims that have either continued or resisted this pattern. It outlines the complexities around key investigations into unsolved homicides dismissed as accidents, suicides, or low priority killings, with the possibility that these classifications are related to a view of homosexual/transgender victims as unworthy of full state attention. The next challenge is moving beyond the individualistic frame of understanding victimhood in crimes targeting members of these minority groups, and any naïve faith that existing pro-victim measures alone will result in systemic openness and equal treatment. The authors suggest that attempts to clarify victim’s legislative rights, enhanced opportunities to recount victim experience, a consolidation of the Coroner’s investigative role, and establishment of a related expert “death review” team, are all worthwhile goals. Finally, we stress that an open NSW Police apology over inadequate past investigations, as well as the promise to seriously re-investigate unsolved cases, are a fair expectation that could also serve to foster victim healing in relation to these crimes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)181-193
Number of pages13
JournalCurrent Issues in Criminal Justice
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • hate crimes
  • judicial error
  • sexual minorities
  • victims
  • violence against

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Victimhood, truth and criminal justice failure in relation to anti-homosexual violence and killings in New South Wales'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this