Virtual courts and putting 'summary' back into 'summary justice' : merely brief, or unjust?

Emma Rowden

    Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapter

    21 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The use of videolinks in courts is often heralded as the beginnings of so-called 'virtual' courts, as evident in a recent pilot undertaken in the United Kingdom. While the option to participate in courtroom hearings from remote locations via videolink has been available in many countries for over two decades, the overall effects of this change in procedure on the experience of justice remains relatively unknown. This chapter will argue that existing practices of participating in court processes from a remote location risk proceedings being perceived as procedurally unjust as fundamental aspects of the judicial process are potentially undermined by current 'virtual'- or what might more aptly be termed 'distributed' -courts.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationArchitecture and Justice: Judicial Meanings in the Public Realm
    EditorsJonathan Simon, Nicholas Temple, Renee Tobe
    Place of PublicationU.K.
    PublisherAshgate
    Pages101-113
    Number of pages13
    ISBN (Electronic)9781409431749
    ISBN (Print)9781409431732
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Keywords

    • architecture and state
    • justice, administration of
    • public architecture
    • videolinks
    • virtual courtrooms

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Virtual courts and putting 'summary' back into 'summary justice' : merely brief, or unjust?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this