Abstract
The use of videolinks in courts is often heralded as the beginnings of so-called 'virtual' courts, as evident in a recent pilot undertaken in the United Kingdom. While the option to participate in courtroom hearings from remote locations via videolink has been available in many countries for over two decades, the overall effects of this change in procedure on the experience of justice remains relatively unknown. This chapter will argue that existing practices of participating in court processes from a remote location risk proceedings being perceived as procedurally unjust as fundamental aspects of the judicial process are potentially undermined by current 'virtual'- or what might more aptly be termed 'distributed' -courts.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Architecture and Justice: Judicial Meanings in the Public Realm |
Editors | Jonathan Simon, Nicholas Temple, Renee Tobe |
Place of Publication | U.K. |
Publisher | Ashgate |
Pages | 101-113 |
Number of pages | 13 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781409431749 |
ISBN (Print) | 9781409431732 |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Keywords
- architecture and state
- justice, administration of
- public architecture
- videolinks
- virtual courtrooms