Abstract
Planning reforms in NSW Australia have resulted in weakening of community engagement. Independent scholars have used rational, collaborative and neoliberal planning theory to explain the reforms. However, theoretical underpinnings of effective community action by the affluent in the East and resignation to fate by the poor in West in Sydney metropolitan have not been explored.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 52nd ISOCARP Congress: Cities We Have vs. Cities We Need, Durban, South Africa, 12-16 September 2016 |
| Publisher | ISOCARP |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9789490354473 |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
| Event | International Society of City and Regional Planners. Congress - Duration: 12 Sept 2016 → … |
Conference
| Conference | International Society of City and Regional Planners. Congress |
|---|---|
| Period | 12/09/16 → … |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- urban transportation
- city planning
- sustainability
- New South Wales
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What theory explains the tale of two cities? : community engagement in urban planning in New South Wales Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver