When they don't die : prognosis ambiguity, role conflict and emotion work in cancer caregiving

Rebecca E. Olson, James Connor

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Informal carers of cancer patients have high rates of burden, stress, anxiety and unmet needs; yet, some describe caregiving as fulfilling. Building on the work of Thomas and colleagues, this study takes a sociology of emotions approach to understanding variations in carers of cancer patients’ emotional experiences, using interview data with 32 carers of a spouse with cancer. Analysis indicates that a clearly terminal (negative) prognosis facilitates clear priorities, unambiguous emotion management and improved social bonds. A more ambiguous (positive) prognosis, that includes a greater chance of survival, fosters role conflict, clashing feeling rules and ongoing guilt within spousal carers. This study highlights the importance of a prognosis to emotion management, underscoring a phenomenon that is likely to grow as survival rates continue to improve and explaining some of the variation in carers’ experiences.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)857-871
    Number of pages15
    JournalJournal of Sociology
    Volume51
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Keywords

    • cancer
    • caregivers
    • coping strategies

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'When they don't die : prognosis ambiguity, role conflict and emotion work in cancer caregiving'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this