Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Which phylogenetic networks are merely trees with additional arcs?

  • Andrew R. Francis
  • , Mike Steel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

94 Citations (Scopus)
19 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A binary phylogenetic network may or may not be obtainable from a tree by the addition of directed edges (arcs) between tree arcs. Here, we establish a precise and easily tested criterion (based on "2-SAT") that efficiently determines whether or not any given network can be realized in this way. Moreover, the proof provides a polynomial-time algorithm for finding one or more trees (when they exist) on which the network can be based. A number of interesting consequences are presented as corollaries; these lead to some further relevant questions and observations, which we outline in the conclusion.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)768-777
Number of pages10
JournalSystematic Biology
Volume64
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Open Access - Access Right Statement

© The Author(s) 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Keywords

  • algorithms
  • biomathematics
  • genetic transformation
  • phylogeny

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Which phylogenetic networks are merely trees with additional arcs?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this