Who stops selling? : a systematic analysis of ex-tobacco retailers

Eleonora Feletto, Suzan Burton, Kelly Williams, Rae Fry, Clare Sutton, Lachlan Bagus, Sam Egger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective There is evidence that wide distribution of cigarettes contributes to smoking, and multiple commentators have called for a review of tobacco retailing. This study analyses retailers who stop selling cigarettes, why they do so, and discusses the implications for tobacco control. Method An audit of tobacco retailers in the Australian state of NSW was used to identify retailers who had stopped selling tobacco, and they were then compared with current retailers to determine how many, and what types of outlets stop selling tobacco. Attempts were made to contact and interview all former tobacco retailers identified in three audited regions. In-depth interviews were conducted with 13 ex-tobacco retailers, or 31% of the subset of ex-tobacco retailers. Results Low-volume outlet types were over-represented as a proportion of retailers exiting the market, and some had resumed selling within 18 months of the audit. Low profits were often cited as a contributor to stopping; however, in all but one case, the decision to stop selling was also influenced by a significant change in business circumstances—either legislative or other business changes. Conclusions Few retailers stop selling tobacco while continuing in the same business, and those who stop disproportionately represent retailer types with low sales volume. The results suggest that legislative changes provide a window where retailers could be prompted to exit the market.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)164-168
Number of pages5
JournalTobacco Control
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • cigarette smokers
  • government policy
  • marketing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Who stops selling? : a systematic analysis of ex-tobacco retailers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this