Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Whose island home? : art and Australian refugee law

  • Ingrid Matthews
  • , James Arvanitakis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

It is a truth too rarely acknowledged that there is no evidence to support the claim that refugees are a national security threat if they arrive by boat to seek asylum. Asylum seekers entering the Australian migration zone by boat are not an invading force, nor are they 'preparing, planning, assisting in or fostering the doing of a terrorist act'. Seeking asylum is a human right. In Australia, accounts of how refugees came to be falsely conflated with national security typically begin with the 2001 'Tampa Affair'. We argue that a longer timeframe reveals socio-cultural norms, founded in British colonialism and Australian coloniality, that offer a fuller explanation for the bipartisan support of indefinite offshore detention.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19-26
Number of pages8
JournalCourt of Conscience
Volume13
Publication statusPublished - 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
  2. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • refugees
  • political refugees
  • national security
  • human rights
  • art
  • Australia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Whose island home? : art and Australian refugee law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this