Why is it so difficult to attract FDI to the MENA countries?

Partha Gangopadhyay, Mohamed Elafif

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this study we constructively argue that the relationship between FDI flows and the per capita GDP for the MENA countries has a novel feature-hitherto unrecognised-which can partially explain the great difficulty of the MENA region in attracting FDI. We show the existence of a separatrix, or trap, in terms of the per capita GDP: To the left of the trap, the change in the flow of FDI as a percentage of GDP declines as the per capita GDP rises. To the right of the trap, the change in the flow of FDI as a percentage of GDP rises with an increase in per capita GDP. Thus, in order to attract FDI, as our results show, the MENA countries must achieve a critical level of economic development in terms of the per capita GDPotherwise FDI flows will be extremely sluggish. From the dataset available for 16 countries during 1996-2013, we find the per capita income trap is at US$ 10,000. In other words, the FDI to GDP ratio is a non-linear function of the per capita GDP for the MENA region. In fact, we find the function to be inverse S-shaped: For per capita incomes less than $10,000, the function is concave-as per capita GDP rises, FDI as a percentage of GDP rises at a declining rate. Beyond this critical value of per capita GDP (trap/separatrix), the function becomes convex: As per capita GDP rises above the trap, FDI as a percentage of GDP then rises at an increasing rate.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)969-975
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Applied Sciences
Volume13
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - 16 Sept 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Partha Gangopadhyay and Mohamed Elafif.

Keywords

  • Africa, North
  • Middle East
  • economic development
  • gross domestic product
  • investments, foreign

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why is it so difficult to attract FDI to the MENA countries?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this