TY - JOUR
T1 - Why PD-L1 expression varies between studies of lung cancer
T2 - results from a bayesian meta-analysis
AU - Ngo, Preston
AU - Cooper, Wendy A.
AU - Wade, Stephen
AU - Fong, Kwun M.
AU - Canfell, Karen
AU - Karikios, Deme
AU - Weber, Marianne
PY - 2025/2
Y1 - 2025/2
N2 - PD-L1 expression is an important biomarker for the management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but has been highly heterogeneous across studies. We developed a statistical model to reconcile conflicting estimates of PD-L1 prevalence by accounting for between-study variation in test sensitivity, specimen age, and laboratory count. In doing so, we obtained refined estimates for PD-L1 expression prevalence and identified differences by histological subtype, mutational status, and stage. Across 92 studies published between 2015 and 2023, the detectability of PD-L1 declined with increasing specimen age while the consistency of detection rates was greater for studies incorporating data from a higher number of laboratories. Using the 22C3 antibody as a benchmark, we predicted that 58.3% (95% CrI 49.8–66.1%) and 27.0% (95% CrI 21.2–33.1%) of NSCLC will have PD-L1 tumour proportion scores at the ≥ 1% and ≥ 50% threshold. PD-L1 expression was lower in EGFR-mutated NSCLC and higher in NSCLC with ALK, KRAS, MET, ROS1, and RET alterations. PD-L1 expression was more common with later-stage disease. Overall, this work highlights the continuing challenge of consistency in PD-L1 testing. Although the underlying prevalence of PD-L1 expression varies in the lung cancer population based on tumour-related factors, controllable differences in testing parameters also account for variations in PD-L1 prevalence.
AB - PD-L1 expression is an important biomarker for the management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but has been highly heterogeneous across studies. We developed a statistical model to reconcile conflicting estimates of PD-L1 prevalence by accounting for between-study variation in test sensitivity, specimen age, and laboratory count. In doing so, we obtained refined estimates for PD-L1 expression prevalence and identified differences by histological subtype, mutational status, and stage. Across 92 studies published between 2015 and 2023, the detectability of PD-L1 declined with increasing specimen age while the consistency of detection rates was greater for studies incorporating data from a higher number of laboratories. Using the 22C3 antibody as a benchmark, we predicted that 58.3% (95% CrI 49.8–66.1%) and 27.0% (95% CrI 21.2–33.1%) of NSCLC will have PD-L1 tumour proportion scores at the ≥ 1% and ≥ 50% threshold. PD-L1 expression was lower in EGFR-mutated NSCLC and higher in NSCLC with ALK, KRAS, MET, ROS1, and RET alterations. PD-L1 expression was more common with later-stage disease. Overall, this work highlights the continuing challenge of consistency in PD-L1 testing. Although the underlying prevalence of PD-L1 expression varies in the lung cancer population based on tumour-related factors, controllable differences in testing parameters also account for variations in PD-L1 prevalence.
KW - Biomarkers
KW - Immunohistochemistry
KW - Immunotherapy
KW - Non-small cell lung cancer
KW - PD-L1
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85218025364&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41598-024-80301-9
DO - 10.1038/s41598-024-80301-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 39905106
AN - SCOPUS:85218025364
SN - 2045-2322
VL - 15
JO - Scientific Reports
JF - Scientific Reports
IS - 1
M1 - 4166
ER -