TY - JOUR
T1 - Why such differing stances? : a review of position statements on home birth from professional colleges
AU - Roome, S.
AU - Hartz, D.
AU - Tracy, S.
AU - Welsh, A. W.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Despite low rates of home birth throughout most Western countries, the topic generates considerable debate. This is reflected by the differing positions on home birth adopted by professional colleges representing obstetricians and midwives. We reviewed position statements of midwifery and obstetric colleges in the UK, USA, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada to explore how the same body of research evidence leads to different positions. Aside from a joint statement from the UK we found widely differing stances, reflecting traditional midwifery perspectives of birth as a physiological process versus obstetric perspectives of potential pathology. We feel the differences in position statements are largely the end product of significant confirmatory bias.
AB - Despite low rates of home birth throughout most Western countries, the topic generates considerable debate. This is reflected by the differing positions on home birth adopted by professional colleges representing obstetricians and midwives. We reviewed position statements of midwifery and obstetric colleges in the UK, USA, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada to explore how the same body of research evidence leads to different positions. Aside from a joint statement from the UK we found widely differing stances, reflecting traditional midwifery perspectives of birth as a physiological process versus obstetric perspectives of potential pathology. We feel the differences in position statements are largely the end product of significant confirmatory bias.
UR - https://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:65945
U2 - 10.1111/1471-0528.13594
DO - 10.1111/1471-0528.13594
M3 - Article
SN - 1470-0328
VL - 123
SP - 376
EP - 382
JO - BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
JF - BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
IS - 3
ER -