Wind-induced pressures around a sectional twin-deck bridge model : effects of gap-width on the aerodynamic forces and vortex shedding mechanisms

K. C. S. Kwok, X. R. Qin, C. H. Fok, P. A. Hitchcock

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    98 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The effects of gap-width on the aerodynamic characteristics of a twin-deck bridge in a nominally smooth flow were investigated in this paper, with a specific goal of studying the vortex shedding mechanisms of the bridge deck. Simultaneous pressure measurements were carried out on five deck configurations, using a rigid sectional model of a twin-deck cable-stayed bridge with different gap-widths. Stream-wise mean and fluctuating pressure distributions around the bridge deck were studied to investigate the potential excitation mechanisms caused by the gap-widths at various angles of wind incidence. The effects of gap-width on the static force and moment coefficients were also analyzed. The results demonstrated that the gap-width has the potential to significantly affect the pressure distribution and hence the corresponding aerodynamic performance of the bridge deck. In addition, the analyzed results showed that the twin-deck bridge in this study is susceptible to vortex shedding and its Strouhal number gradually increases with increasing gap-width due to the change of flow regime around the bridge deck. This knowledge is essential for the complete aerodynamic evaluation of a twin-deck bridge.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)50-61
    Number of pages12
    JournalJournal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics
    Volume110
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Keywords

    • aerodynamics
    • bridges
    • excitation mechanisms
    • flow regimes
    • vortex shedding
    • wind, pressure

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Wind-induced pressures around a sectional twin-deck bridge model : effects of gap-width on the aerodynamic forces and vortex shedding mechanisms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this