Wood and water : an historical assessment of South Africa’s past and present forestry policies as they relate to water conservation

Fred J. Kruger, Brett M. Bennett

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    13 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Finding ways to conserve limited water supplies while promoting economic development has been, and will continue to be, one of South Africa's most enduring environmental challenges. South Africa's forestry sector has sat – often controversially – at the crossroads of policy debates regarding both water conservation and economic development. This historical analysis examines how conflicts surrounding exotic afforestation led to the establishment of the Jonkershoek Forestry Research Station in 1935. It demonstrates how research findings from Jonkershoek formed the basis of a comprehensive national catchment management strategy that tried to harmonise the afforestation of exotic forests, the preservation of indigenous vegetation and the rights of downstream water users. This framework dominated water conservation policy discussions and outcomes from the late 1960s to the late 1980s. This programme fell into decline when catchment management was handed over to provinces in the late 1980s and a raft of new post-apartheid legislation and plans – the centrepiece being the National Water Act in 1998 – redirected research funding and forestry policies established between 1935 and 1994. In conclusion, we suggest that South Africa's water policies, as they related to exotic forests, should be reviewed in light of broader historical, scientific and economic findings.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)163-174
    Number of pages12
    JournalTransactions of the Royal Society of South Africa
    Volume68
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Wood and water : an historical assessment of South Africa’s past and present forestry policies as they relate to water conservation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this