Workforce perceptions of human factors as indicators of plant reliability and process safety

Ari Antonovsky, Leon Straker, Clare Pollock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Human factors, as perceived by the maintenance workforce, were used as the measure for comparing work areas within a petroleum company. These factors were then compared to an objective measure of reliability (Mean Time Between Failures) in order to determine which factors would be most predictive of plant reliability and process safety. Maintenance personnel were surveyed using scales based on Problem-solving, Vigilance, Design and maintenance, Job-related feedback and Information about change. Analysis of Variance was used to assess the strength of these variables in relation to Reliability Level. Significant differences were observed between different reliability levels based on workforce perceptions of problem-solving requirements and the design and maintainability of plant. Conclusions were that perceptions of human factors in the workplace can be predictive of group-level performance, and that if issues relating to design and maintainability are not addressed at the design stage, greater problem-solving abilities will be required from maintenance personnel.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-183
Number of pages13
JournalErgonomics
Volume64
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Workforce perceptions of human factors as indicators of plant reliability and process safety'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this