!Xóõ click perception by English, Isizulu, and Sesotho listeners

Catherine T. Best, Anthony Traill, Allyson Carter, K. David Harrison, Alice Faber

    Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperConference Paper

    Abstract

    ![CDATA[Many, though not all, non-native phonological contrasts pose discrimination difficulties. The Perceptual Assimilation Model attributes discrimination differences to listeners' assimilations of non-native phones to their native phonologies, which vary across languages. We examined perception of two !Xóõ click contrasts by American English speakers and speakers of Isizulu and Sesotho, African click languages that lack the target contrasts. The Africans should assimilate !Xóõ clicks to native ones and discriminate accordingly; Americans should perceive them as non-speech and discriminate them well. Isizulu's click system is richer than Sesotho's, so Isizulu speakers should perform better on at least one contrast. Americans should excel on contrasts that Africans assimilate to a single click. As predicted, Isizulu listeners assimilated !Xóõ clicks to native clicks most often, Americans heard non-speech most often. Sesotho listeners were poorest on one contrast they had difficulty categorizing. Americans excelled on the other, which the Africans assimilated to a single click.]]
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona 3-9 August 2003
    PublisherCausal Productions
    Number of pages4
    ISBN (Print)1876346485
    Publication statusPublished - 2003
    EventInternational Congress of Phonetic Sciences -
    Duration: 17 Aug 2011 → …

    Conference

    ConferenceInternational Congress of Phonetic Sciences
    Period17/08/11 → …

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of '!Xóõ click perception by English, Isizulu, and Sesotho listeners'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this