Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Strategies for managing human workload to improve trust calibration in human-autonomy teaming (HAT)

  • Matt Cabanag

    Western Sydney University thesis: Doctoral thesis

    Abstract

    This thesis is situated within Human-Autonomy Teaming (HAT), focusing on human trust in autonomous teammates, particularly in Command and Control (C2) contexts.

    Chapter 1 introduces HAT by drawing on Human-Human (HH) team dynamics, outlining motivations for HAT research and key topics such as trust calibration, transparency, and shared mental models.

    Chapter 2 examines O’Neill’s critique of the fragmented approaches currently prevalent in HAT. It reviews a selection of conceptual models relevant to HAT, including those developed by De Visser et al. (De Visser et al., 2018, 2020), Hoff and Bashir (Hoff & Bashir, 2015), and Hou et al. (Hou et al., 2021), among others.

    Chapter 3 follows up on Chapter 1’s initial proposal of using of Cognitive Fit Theory as a means of addressing the issue of cognitive overload associated with transparency information in HAT. Cognitive Fit Theory offers a mechanism for reducing the cognitive costs of visual information used in decision-making, making it particularly relevant to HAT contexts.

    Chapter 4 details some methodologies and tools used in Experiments 1 and 2, focusing on SimpleC2Sim, an open-source web-based testbed developed by the author (GitHub.com). SimpleC2Sim improves accessibility, reduces logistical burdens, and provides an in-task behavioural measure for trust calibration.

    Chapter 5 presents Experiment 1, which tests an early version of the Component-based Model of Cognitive Fit using three display types. While the model correctly predicted cognitive fit, it failed to accurately rank misfit displays due to a “distractor effect”, prompting a revision and a followup evaluation in Experiment 2.

    Chapter 6 reports Experiment 2, applying the revised model (now incorporating the “distractor effect”) to a new task, but still using the same display types from Experiment 1.

    Chapter 7 explores the broader implications of the findings, including partial validation of the Cost-based Team Interaction Cycle, and outlines future research directions based on the "distractor effect".
    Date of Thesis submission2026
    Original languageEnglish
    Awarding Institution
    • Western Sydney University
    SponsorsAustralian Government Research Training Program Scholarship
    SupervisorChris Stanton (Supervisor), Kate Stevens (Supervisor) & John Cass (Supervisor)

    Cite this

    '